File:Maurya Empire, c.250 BCE.png

原本檔案(1,200 × 1,121 像素,檔案大細:2.3 MB ,MIME類型:image/png

摘要

描述

This is based on the map provided on p. 69 of Kulke, H.; Rothermund, D. (2004), A History of India, 4th, Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-32920-0.

  • According to the authors, the empty areas within the boundaries of the empire were the "autonomous and free tribes".
  • For individual edicts, see also: Schwartzberg, J. E. (1992), A Historical Atlas of South Asia: University of Oxford Press; and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Edicts_of_Ashoka
  • According to both Kulke & Rothermund (p. 68-71), as well as Stein (p. 74), large areas, especially in the Deccan peninsula, were probably occupied by fairly autonomous or even unconquered tribes.

    "Of course, it is not impossible that some may be still discovered but after more than a century of intensive research in this field it seems highly unlikely that the regional pattern mentioned above would have to be completely revised. This means that large parts of present Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh as well as Kerala and Tamil Nadu were not actually included in the Maurya empire. South of the Vindhya mountains the Mauryas mainly controlled the coastal areas and some of the interior near present Mysore which they probably coveted because of the gold which was found there (Suvarnagiri means ‘gold mountain’). For the empire it was essential to control the major trade routes. Most important was certainly the northern route which led from Pataliputra through the Gangetic plain and the Panjab to Afghanistan. Another led from Pataliputra west via Kausambi and then along the northern slope of the Vindhya mountains via Vidisha (Sanchi) and Ujjain to the port of Bharukacha (Broach). There was a further route from there along the west coast to the area of present Bombay where the great rock edicts of Sopara were found. Southern parts could be reached along the east coast or via a central route from Ujjain via Pratishthana (Paithan near Aurangabad) to Suvarnagiri."

  • "The major part of the Deccan was ruled by [Mauryan administration]. But in the belt of land on either side of the Nerbudda, the Godavari and the upper Mahanadi there were, in all probability, certain areas that were technically outside the limits of the empire proper. Asoka evidently draws a distinction between the forests and the inhabiting tribes which are in the dominions (vijita) and peoples on the border (anta avijita) for whose benefit some of the special edicts were issued. Certain vassal tribes are specifically mentioned." (Raychaudhuri & Mukherjee pp. 275-6)
  • "Desert of Gedrosia [...] was left an unclaimed wilderness." —Kosmin, Paul J. (2014), The Land of the Elephant Kings Space, Territory, and Ideology in the Seleucid Empire, Harvard University Press, p.16
  • See also --Stein, Burton (1998). A History of India (1st ed.), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. --Raychaudhuri, H. C.; Mukherjee, B. N. (1996). Political History of Ancient India: From the Accession of Parikshit to the Extinction of the Gupta Dynasty. Oxford University Press.
  • Background from http://www2.demis.nl/mapserver/mapper.asp
  • Made with GIMP
日期
來源 自己作品
作者 Avantiputra7

協議

我,呢份作品嘅作者,決定用以下許可發佈呢件作品:
w:en:Creative Commons
署名 相同方式分享
你可以:
  • 去分享 – 複製、發佈同傳播呢個作品
  • 再改 – 創作演繹作品
要遵照下面嘅條件:
  • 署名 – 你一定要畀合適嘅表彰、畀返指向呢個授權條款嘅連結,同埋寫明有無改過嚟。你可以用任何合理方式去做,但唔可以用任何方式暗示授權人認可咗你或者你嘅使用方式。
  • 相同方式分享 – 如果你用任何方式改過呢個作品,你必須要用返原本或者相似嘅條款發佈。

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents
India under Maurya rule c. 250 BCE

29 6 2014

image/png

檔案歷史

撳個日期/時間去睇響嗰個時間出現過嘅檔案。

最近最舊) 睇【新10次】【102050100250500
日期/時間縮圖尺寸用戶註解
現時2024年1月29號 (一) 02:15響2024年1月29號 (一) 02:15嘅縮圖版本1,200 × 1,121(2.3 MB)Avantiputra7as per discussions added labelling of provinces
2023年11月22號 (三) 06:40響2023年11月22號 (三) 06:40嘅縮圖版本1,200 × 1,121(2.06 MB)Avantiputra7Reverted to version as of 05:59, 22 November 2023 (UTC) no justification for changing to less legible version of exactly the same map
2023年11月22號 (三) 06:14響2023年11月22號 (三) 06:14嘅縮圖版本1,500 × 1,309(2.93 MB)Indo12122Reverted to version as of 05:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC) Stop hijacking.
2023年11月22號 (三) 05:59響2023年11月22號 (三) 05:59嘅縮圖版本1,200 × 1,121(2.06 MB)Avantiputra7Reverted to version as of 05:06, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
2023年11月22號 (三) 05:34響2023年11月22號 (三) 05:34嘅縮圖版本1,500 × 1,309(2.93 MB)Indo12122Reverted to version as of 19:00, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
2023年11月22號 (三) 05:06響2023年11月22號 (三) 05:06嘅縮圖版本1,200 × 1,121(2.06 MB)Avantiputra7Reverted to version as of 18:13, 21 November 2023 (UTC) rv vandalism
2023年11月21號 (二) 19:00響2023年11月21號 (二) 19:00嘅縮圖版本1,500 × 1,309(2.93 MB)Indo12122Reverted to version as of 17:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC) Adding Gedrosia .Ray, Himanshu Prabha (2003). The Archaeology of Seafaring in Ancient South Asia. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-01109-9. In spite of the vagueness of the historical texts, the consensus among scholars is that the treaty concluded between Candragupta Maurya and Seleucus acknowledged Indian control of territories to the west of the Indus. These included Gedrosia, Paropamisadae (the region of Kabul and Begram) a...
2023年11月21號 (二) 18:13響2023年11月21號 (二) 18:13嘅縮圖版本1,200 × 1,121(2.06 MB)Avantiputra7Reverted to version as of 17:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC) no justification for changing to less legible version of exactly the same map
2023年11月21號 (二) 17:53響2023年11月21號 (二) 17:53嘅縮圖版本1,500 × 1,309(2.93 MB)Indo12122Reverted to version as of 16:58, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
2023年11月21號 (二) 17:07響2023年11月21號 (二) 17:07嘅縮圖版本1,200 × 1,121(2.06 MB)Avantiputra7Reverted to version as of 16:36, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
最近最舊) 睇【新10次】【102050100250500

無嘢連來呢份檔案。

全域檔案使用情況

Metadata