User talk:Hillgentleman/20070809160426
Censorship is not issue here.
編輯- 有嘢講：/Comment：
Usefulness is the key. The external links is useful to illustrate the subjects. In the example I mentioned, there are many selections available to the topic that can equally well illustrate the article. I check with the same article in Japanese and Chinese, they chose the less explicit links or links carrying out warming. It seems to me that the selection is purely based on author's value. I guess the factor here is whether the links are ads or promotion or commerical in nature.
Is there guideline on what sort of external links is better for Wikipedia ?
--WikiCantona 2007年8月9號 (四) 16:20 (UTC)
- 有嘢講：/Comment： An external link is as useful as how much it contributes to the encyclopaedic content. For example, if the article discusses the body features of the actor, an external link to an image of the body is relevant.
--* -- :-) Hillgentleman | 書 | 二零零七年八月九號（星期四）格林尼治 17點21分38秒。 2007年8月9號 (四) 17:21 (UTC)
- 有嘢講：/Comment：
--* -- :-) Hillgentleman | 書 | 二零零七年八月九號（星期四）格林尼治 23點16分21秒。 2007年8月9號 (四) 23:16 (UTC)