User talk:Hillgentleman/20070809135429
- 有嘢講：/Comment：
The interesting things are that the subject is about the Japanese AV porn star. The links to her sites containing nudity. Of course, there are links about her containing no nudity. It seems to be more about the selection of links. What is the base of selection of links, is the matter here...
--WikiCantona 2007年8月9號 (四) 15:45 (UTC)
- 有嘢講：/Comment： Wikipedia is not censored. WP:NOT. We keep an external link if it is useful to the encyclopaedic content. EN:WP:PORN and the references therein should answer you questions.
--* -- :-) Hillgentleman | 書 | 二零零七年八月九號（星期四）格林尼治 16點04分26秒。 2007年8月9號 (四) 16:04 (UTC)
Censorship is not issue here. 編輯
- 有嘢講：/Comment：
Usefulness is the key. The external links is useful to illustrate the subjects. In the example I mentioned, there are many selections available to the topic that can equally well illustrate the article. I check with the same article in Japanese and Chinese, they chose the less explicit links or links carrying out warming. It seems to me that the selection is purely based on author's value. I guess the factor here is whether the links are ads or promotion or commerical in nature.
Is there guideline on what sort of external links is better for Wikipedia ?
--WikiCantona 2007年8月9號 (四) 16:20 (UTC)
- 有嘢講：/Comment： An external link is as useful as how much it contributes to the encyclopaedic content. For example, if the article discusses the body features of the actor, an external link to an image of the body is relevant.
--* -- :-) Hillgentleman | 書 | 二零零七年八月九號（星期四）格林尼治 17點21分38秒。 2007年8月9號 (四) 17:21 (UTC)
- 有嘢講：/Comment：
--* -- :-) Hillgentleman | 書 | 二零零七年八月九號（星期四）格林尼治 23點16分21秒。 2007年8月9號 (四) 23:16 (UTC)