我有權發表意見

我有權發表意見（粵拼：ngo⁵ jau⁵ kyun⁴ faat³ biu² ji³ gin³；英文：I'm entitled to my opinion，或者 I have a right to my opinion）係一種謬論，指有陣時啲人喺撞到反對意見嗰陣，用「我有權發表意見」或者類似嘅說話嚟將對手嘅反駁講到好似係對手唔啱噉^[1]^[2]^[3]。例如係以下呢段對話：

A 君：我覺得進化論係錯嘅，佢根本係啲無神論者作出嚟嘅一個理論之嘛！根本完全冇證據！

B 君：我想講呢，如果你真係有睇過進化論相關嘅書同論文嘅話，你應該會知進化論查實有多方面嘅證據支撐，由實驗以至對化石嘅觀察都有。

A 君：我有權發表意見，唔該尊重我講嘢嘅權利！

B 君：我冇禁止你發言喎。

A 君查實用咗一個謬論，因為 B 君做緊嘅嘢唔係「嘗試禁止 A 君發言」，而係「指出佢所講嘅嘢嘅漏洞」，兩樣嘢根本唔一樣：有啲人會唔同意對手講嘅嘢，但係依然尊重對手講嘢嘅權利；又有啲人會唔同意對手講嘅嘢得嚟，再做啲嘢嘗試夾硬唔俾對手發言。亦即係話，「指出一個人所講嘅嘢嘅漏洞」唔等如「嘗試禁止佢發言」，所以 A 君講嗰句「我有權發表意見」雖然有道理，但係根本冇喺度回應 B 君對佢個主張嘅反駁。呢個係唔啦更謬論嘅一種－A 君喺度講埋嗮啲唔啦更嘅嘢引開人注意，等其他人留意唔到佢講嗰啲嘢嘅荒謬之處^[4]。

澳洲哲學家 Patrick Stokes 指出，「我有權發表意見」呢句嘢喺西方社會成日都俾人攞嚟維護一啲根本企唔到喺度嘅論點，而呢啲人似乎搞錯咗，以為「有權發表意見」等如「有權唔俾其他人批評自己嘅意見」^[5]。

睇埋

謬論
- 唔啦更謬論
- 草人謬論

攷

↑ Whyte, Jamie (2004). "The Right to Your Opinion". Crimes Against Logic. New York: McGraw-Hill.
↑ Deleuze, Gilles (1994). "The Image of Thought". Difference and Repetition. Paul Patton (trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
↑ Whyte, Jamie (August 9, 2004). "Sorry, but you are not entitled to your opinion". The Times. News UK.
↑ 李天命，《李天命的思考藝術（最終定本）》，2009，p.112.
↑ Stokes, Patrick (9 October 2012). "You're not entitled to your opinion". New Zealand Herald.

[1] Whyte, Jamie (2004). "The Right to Your Opinion". Crimes Against Logic. New York: McGraw-Hill.

[2] Deleuze, Gilles (1994). "The Image of Thought". Difference and Repetition. Paul Patton (trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

[3] Whyte, Jamie (August 9, 2004). "Sorry, but you are not entitled to your opinion". The Times. News UK.

[4] 李天命，《李天命的思考藝術（最終定本）》，2009，p.112.

[5] Stokes, Patrick (9 October 2012). "You're not entitled to your opinion". New Zealand Herald.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]